|
The one-state solution and the similar binational solution are proposed approaches to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.〔 Proponents of a binational solution to the conflict advocate a single state in Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip,〔〔FELICE FRIEDSON, "One-state or two-state solution", ''The Jerusalem Post'', 07/21/2010〕 with citizenship and equal rights in the combined entity for all inhabitants of all three territories, without regard to ethnicity or religion.〔 While some advocate this solution for ideological reasons,〔 others feel simply that, due to the reality on the ground, it is the de facto situation. Though increasingly debated in academic circles, this approach has remained outside the range of official efforts to resolve the conflict as well as mainstream analysis, where it is eclipsed by the two-state solution. The two-state solution was most recently agreed upon in principle by the government of Israel and the Palestinian Authority at the November 2007 Annapolis Conference and remains the conceptual basis for negotiations proposed by the administration of U.S. president Barack Obama in 2011. Interest in a one-state solution is growing, however, as the two-state approach fails to accomplish a final agreement.〔〔 == Overview == The "one-state solution" refers to a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through the creation of a unitary, federal or confederate Israeli-Palestinian state, which would encompass all of the present territory of Israel, the West Bank including East Jerusalem, and possibly the Gaza Strip. Depending on various points of view, a one-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is presented as a situation in which Israel would ostensibly lose its character as a Jewish state and the Palestinians would fail to achieve their national independence within a two-state solution〔 or, alternatively, as the best, most just, and only way to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Although the terms "one-state solution" and "bi-national solution" are often used synonymously, they do not necessarily mean the same thing. In debates about a one-state solution in Israel-Palestine, bi-nationalism refers to a political system in which the two groups, Jews and Palestinians, would retain their legal and political character as separate nations or nationalities, perhaps similar to the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Czechoslovakia. In most bi-national arguments for a one-state solution, such an arrangement is deemed necessary both to ensure the protection of minorities (whichever group that is) and to reassure both groups that their collective interests would be protected. Counter-arguments are that bi-nationalism would entrench the two identities politically in ways that would foster their continuing rivalry and social divides; these arguments favour a unitary democratic state, or one-person-one-vote arrangement. Support for a one-state solution is increasing as Palestinians, frustrated by lack of progress in negotiations aiming to establish the two-state solution, increasingly see the one-state solution as an alternative way forward.〔Rachel Shabi, ("The death of the Israel-Palestine two-state solution brings fresh hope," ) The Guardian (23 October 2012). Retrieved 17-12-2013.〕〔David Poort, ("The threat of a one-state solution," ) Al Jazeera (26 January 2011). Retrieved 17-12-2013.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「One-state solution」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|